


The role of memory is a significant one in The Winter’s Tale. In a production of the play, a director might choose to emphasize or deemphasize the remembrance of past events in the play. It might be that a specific production will have Leontes, during the last two acts, constantly reminded of his past mistakes through the staging, costuming, and blocking. It might be that there are very few mementos of the tragic events of the first three acts, simply recitation of the lines that mention the disasters without any particular emphasis. In the Royal Shakespeare Company’s production of The Winter’s Tale, directed by David Farr, reminders of the past show themselves in the set design, especially in the recurring visual motif using books and papers.
This production of The Winter’s Tale, performed on October 3 at the Courtyard Theatre in Stratford-upon-Avon, was miraculous. Every actor played their role not just convincingly but with a great deal of appropriate fervor and emotion. Some of the actors portrayed their characters in a way that helped me to believe certain events to be more probable. I was especially impressed with the actor who played Leontes and his ability to play the part of a jealous and vengeful tyrant while at the same time seeming so vulnerable. This helped to believe in his change of heart more and made the moment when he is reunited with Hermione very powerful.
The motif dealing with books and papers played a dominant role in the set design. Act II ends with a dramatic cascade of books, falling off their shelves in a swirl of dramatic chaos as the chandelier crashes to the floor. The bear that chases, or in the case of this production, drags Antigonus offstage is made of pages from a book. Rather than sweeping the destruction off the stage, the production leaves the books on stage, and they become part of the scenery for the second half of the play. The wreckage of the cold, blue books and disheveled shelves starkly contrasts with the vivid colors of the set design and costuming Acts IV and V. However, the Bohemian setting still has hints of the falling books: the stage is littered with papers and each tree branch is covered by page-leaves, as if the trees were growing out of a story.
Although the motif dominates the last acts of the play, books also have a significant role in the beginning acts as well. Before their dramatic demise, the neatly organized bookshelves loom over the set. In the beginning of a scene, after having accused his wife and best friend of adultery, Leontes is seen thumbing through one of the volumes. At the end of Act III when the Shepherd discovers the baby Perdita even he ties in the book motif: “Though I am not bookish, yet I can read waiting-gentlewoman in the scape” (III.iii.72-73). And Time, who begins Act IV by setting the scene sixteen years later, held a book in his hand.
The question is raised: why are books such a prominent element in the production? The book motif effectively reminds the audience of the past events of the play, particularly the dramatic falling bookshelves that can be interpreted to represent the falling apart of Leontes’ world with the death of his wife and son. The first time the audience sees Leontes after the sixteen years have passed by, at the beginning of Act V, he is sitting among the rubble of books, talking about how he remembers the virtues of Hermione. This suggests that the books somehow act as a reminder to Leontes of his past misdeeds.
Also, the book theme is reminiscent of the title of the play. As the viewer contemplates the importance of tales in the plot, he or she is reminded of the scene when Mamillius begins telling a tale of “sprites and goblins” in Act II scene 1, and while dwelling on Mamillius, is reminded of his tragic death and absence for the rest of the play. Although the rest of his family is eventually reunited, Mamillius is markedly missing. With this interpretation in mind, the book and paper motif casts a melancholy shadow over the play, stirring the viewer’s memory of the tragic loss that occurs. Even after Leontes, Hermione, and Perdita are together once more, the soldiers’ jackets are still covered in dust from the destruction at the end of Act II, reminding the viewer of the falling of the bookshelves, the demise of family relationships, and most sadly, the death of a little boy who isn’t restored to the arms of his parents.
Because David Farr’s production strongly emphasized the remembrance of past events in the play, the poignancy of the hopeful redemption of Leontes and the sadness of the missing Mamillius are made more potent. Not only does memory play a significant part in the remorse and redemption of Leontes, but because of David Farr’s production contains the books and papers motif that makes memory an important factor in the viewing experience.